The Risky Planner™

What AACE 2026 Revealed About the Gap Between AI Vendors and Project Practitioners

Albert & Nate w/Dokainish & Company Season 2 Episode 26

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 58:42

Send us Fan Mail

Fifteen people at the AACE conference in June answered the same five questions about AI in project controls: what they are building, what excites them, and what they have learned. Their answers split into two groups. Software vendors describe AI products already in market. Practitioners describe AI use that is early, cautious, or absent.

Albert Brier hosts this full set of interviews from the AACE Expo floor. He covers vendors building AI-driven scheduling, predictive risk models, and natural-language schedule queries, then hands the microphone to project directors, risk principals, and PMO leaders working construction, nuclear, and infrastructure programs. The pattern that emerges: vendors talk about AI as a core product feature. Practitioners talk about AI as something they are still evaluating.

Girish Bhatia of ConstructMind describes cutting schedule generation time from 25 days to 25 minutes using a "human AI human" architecture, where AI handles logic and duration calculations and humans validate the output because AI cannot take liability for the result. Philip Talbot of Nodes and Links describes AI that lets users query a schedule in natural language, isolated from the open internet so project data never leaves the client's environment. Rhys Phillips of nPlan describes predictive models trained on nearly a decade of historical project outcomes to forecast duration and risk on new projects. Rohit Sinha of SmartPM Technologies explains why his team builds custom models instead of using general-purpose tools: general-purpose models "are not very good at construction," and the stakes on projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars do not tolerate wrong answers.

The practitioners tell a different story. Justin Jacobsen of MBP says his team is still in an exploration phase, mostly using AI to help build internal software rather than to run project controls directly. Matthew Schoenhardt, who has run a quarter trillion dollars of quantitative risk analysis, says he is doing "nothing really" with AI yet, though the conference gave him ideas. Sara Horsey of Bridging Pennsylvania Constructors says her team uses AI for consolidating safety statistics but has not implemented it on the project controls side. Holly Parkis describes a risk-based, cautious approach: AI as a tool, not a driver, pending solutions to hallucination and cost problems.

Several interviews single out data centers as the sector moving fastest, with procurement backlogs running five to eight years and hyperscalers scaling teams to match. Matthew Schoenhardt connects that pace to a broader industry shift away from formal quantitative risk analysis on owner-funded megaprojects. Rachel Fleming of MBP and Diana Nada both name communication, not technology, as the lesson they carry into every project. Tracy Leung of Ontario Power Generation discusses a $700 million equity investment from the Williams Treaty First Nations into the Darlington New Project small modular reactor program, and what genuine partnership with Indigenous nations requires beyond a permitting step.

Software vendors at AACE are building AI products for scheduling, risk analysis, and predictive forecasting. The practitioners who would use those products are, by their own account, still in exploration, still cautious about data security, and in at least one case still deciding whether to start. The gap between those two positions is the subject of this episode.

The AI enthusiasm at AACE is real. The adoption gap between vendors and practitioners is also real. Closing it starts with naming it honestly.

Read the companion blog post: What AACE 2026 Revealed About the Gap Between AI Vendors and Project Practitioners

Presented by Dokainish & Company www.dokainish.com

The Risky Planner podcast delivers expert insights on project controls, capital project management, and strategic planning for today's complex business environment. Subscribe for regular episodes featuring industry leaders and practical advice.

People on this episode

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.